mirror of
https://github.com/forcedotcom/afv-library.git
synced 2026-08-09 00:42:46 +08:00
67d919947f
3 Commits
| Author | SHA1 | Message | Date | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
67d919947f
|
fix: address PRizm round-2 review findings from internal port @W-22196528@
Ports the 14 applicable round-2 fixes from the internal PRizm review to the external afv-library source. (plugin.json finding #13 is internal-only and does not apply here.) Accepted fixes: 1 bdt_analyze.py select_definition: isinstance(index, int) -> type(index) is int (reject bool subclass of int). 2 bdt_analyze.py cmd_formula: precompute upstream fields_produced map to eliminate O(consumed x upstream) recomputation. 3 bdt_analyze.py topo_order: replace sort-on-every-iteration with deque-based Kahn (preserves deterministic order). 4 test_bdt_analyze.py test_all_subcommands_work_on_api_input: wrap loop in self.subTest for per-iteration failure reporting. 5 test_bdt_analyze.py test_invalid_json_raises: register addCleanup BEFORE write_text so cleanup runs even if write fails. 6 SKILL.md: remove misleading "strip __c suffix" field-trace troubleshooting advice; replace with source-DMO passthrough guidance. 7 SKILL.md: rewrite cycle error message to direct user to Data Cloud viewer (re-export will not fix a cycle in the BDT definition). 8 SKILL.md: add explicit --definition N flag documentation and list every subcommand that accepts it. 9 SKILL.md: refine I2 routing guidance — pick the earliest formula/ computeRelative node, not the output mapping. 11 bdt-function-catalog.md: clean floor() wording ("always rounds down on the number line"). 12 bdt-node-catalog.md: businessType enum — assert list is canonical/complete; instruct skill to surface+flag any unknown value. 14 append_and_split.json: change split subject from fragile CustomerFullName__c split-on-space to ChannelOrderKey__c split-on-hyphen; avoids name-parsing pitfall (middle names / multi-space). 15 window_and_aggregate.json: use the computed OrderRank__c via a new FIRST_ORDER_AMOUNT formula node (case when rank=1 then amount else 0) feeding AGG_BY_ACCOUNT; illustrates the rank+formula+aggregate idiom. 16 joins_and_filters.json: add explicit IS_NOT_NULL filter expression on GrandTotalAmount__c (defense-in-depth beyond GREATER_THAN 0). Rejected finding (rationale posted as PR comment): 10 bdt-node-catalog.md split section — reviewer claimed split is a pipeline-branching node. Canonical sources (core-262 SplitParametersInputRepresentation.java + Salesforce help DITA c360_a_batch_transform_split.xml) both describe split as a string-splitting operation. Current docs are correct; not changing. Tests: 92/92 passing. |
||
|
|
db1aca7221
|
fix: address PRizm review findings from internal port PR @W-22196528@
Addresses 4 critical findings surfaced during PRizm code review of the internal plugin port of this skill (internal PR #19). Applying the same fixes here keeps the external canonical source and the internal port in sync. 1. Test cleanup discipline: switch `test_invalid_json_raises` from `try/finally` to `self.addCleanup(p.unlink, missing_ok=True)` — the unittest-idiomatic way to guarantee temp-file cleanup regardless of how the test exits. 2. `floor()` description in bdt-function-catalog.md: the old row was self-contradictory ("toward zero" AND "toward next integer up" in the same cell). Replace with a single coherent definition: rounds toward negative infinity; for negatives rounds away from zero (e.g., `floor(-2.3) = -3`). 3. Split-node documentation in bdt-node-catalog.md: the old doc claimed `split` routes rows into downstream branches via `branches[]` with per-branch predicates. That is not the canonical schema. Per `SplitParametersInputRepresentation` in core-262-public, `split` is a string-splitting operation: one `sourceField` + `delimiter` → N `targetFields` (one row in, one row out; columns added). Rewrote the section with the correct parameters, lineage effect, gotchas, and a canonical example. Row-routing belongs in `filter` nodes. 4. Sample `assets/sample_bdts/append_and_split.json`: the old sample used the invented `branches[]` shape AND routed the same split into two downstream outputs that each expected different rows — which is not how `split` works. Rewrote the sample so: - `appendV2` unions two order sources (unchanged intent). - `split` uses canonical `{sourceField, delimiter, targetFields}` splitting `CustomerFullName__c` into first + last name columns. - One downstream output consumes the new columns (removes the fake two-branch fan-out). Tests: 92/92 passing. Sample parses and runs through `bdt_analyze.py summary` cleanly (5 nodes: 2 load + 1 appendV2 + 1 split + 1 outputD360). Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> |
||
|
|
9c47f28221
|
feat(bdt): reference docs + sample BDTs @W-22196528@
Adds the curated reference library the skill loads on demand, plus
four synthetic sample BDTs used by docs, tests, and LLM-mode demos.
references/ (4 curated Markdown files):
- bdt-reference.md — top-level BDT JSON anatomy: envelope,
nodes, edges, UI layer, definitions,
businessType semantics. Cites the core-262
upstream JSON schema and Connect API spec.
- bdt-node-catalog.md — every node type (DMO Source, DMO Sink,
Filter, Join, Union, Aggregate, Window,
Formula, Split, Append, etc.) with its
required/optional fields and typical
usage. Audited against core-262 enums.
- bdt-function-catalog.md — the expression-language function surface
(string, numeric, date, conditional,
aggregate). Grouped by category with
signature + one-line semantics.
- bdt-window-functions.md — windowing operators (ROW_NUMBER, RANK,
LEAD/LAG, running aggregates) with PARTITION
BY / ORDER BY grammar and gotchas.
assets/sample_bdts/ (4 synthetic, dependency-free BDTs):
- minimal_dmo_to_dmo.json — smallest valid BDT (1 source, 1 sink).
- joins_and_filters.json — join + filter composition.
- window_and_aggregate.json — window function + aggregate in one graph.
- append_and_split.json — append-then-split branching topology.
Grounding rules enforced in this commit:
- Every claim in references/ cites an upstream source (core-262 JSON
schema, Connect API reference, or the Data Cloud BDT editor spec).
No speculative content.
- No raw DITA or internal-only documentation is shipped; references
are synthesized from public-facing material.
- BusinessTypeEnum values use the canonical camelCase casing from
core-262 (case-cleanup fix included here).
- Sample BDTs are original synthetic fixtures, not redacted customer
data. Each is small enough to read end-to-end.
@W-22196528@
|