mirror of
https://github.com/forcedotcom/afv-library.git
synced 2026-07-30 19:50:42 +08:00
* @W-21955450@ Rename topic to subagent for Agent Script v2
Aligns with Agent Script v2 naming standards where `topic` is renamed
to `subagent` across all skill documentation and templates.
Changes:
- Agent Script templates: topic keyword → subagent keyword
- References: @topic.* → @subagent.*
- Documentation: Updated all skill references and guides
- Natural language references preserved in comments/descriptions
* Rename start_agent topic_selector to agent_router
Completes the topic → subagent terminology alignment by:
1. Renaming start_agent from topic_selector to agent_router (15 agent files)
2. Updating template topic declarations: topic {{placeholder}} → subagent {{placeholder}} (5 files)
3. Updating all @subagent.topic_selector references to @subagent.agent_router (35 occurrences)
4. Updating documentation: prose, examples, and diagrams (10 markdown files)
5. Updating comments to use agent_router terminology
Files affected:
- 22 agent template files
- 10 documentation/reference markdown files
- Template component files
The agent_router name is more descriptive of its actual function
(routing to different subagents) and completes the Agent Script v2
terminology standardization.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
* Rename files with "topic" to use "subagent" terminology
Completes the topic → subagent terminology alignment by renaming
files and updating all references:
**Files renamed (5):**
- multi-topic.agent → multi-subagent.agent
- template-single-topic.agent → template-single-subagent.agent
- template-multi-topic.agent → template-multi-subagent.agent
- topic-with-actions.agent → subagent-with-actions.agent
- agent-topic-map-diagrams.md → agent-subagent-map-diagrams.md
**References updated (6 docs):**
- Updated all filename references to point to new filenames
- Updated "Topic Map" → "Subagent Map" throughout documentation
- Updated "multi-topic"/"single-topic" → "multi-subagent"/"single-subagent"
Files modified:
- README.md, SKILL.md, agent-spec-template.md
- assets/agents/README.md, assets/README-legacy.md
- references/agent-design-and-spec-creation.md
This ensures consistent "subagent" terminology across filenames,
file content, and all documentation references.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
* Complete topic-to-subagent terminology update across skills
Comprehensive update replacing "topic" with "subagent" terminology throughout
the developing-agentforce and testing-agentforce skills to align with Agent
Script's `subagent` block naming.
Key changes:
- "Topic Selector" → "Subagent Router" in all agent templates and docs
- "Topic/action" → "Subagent/action" in documentation
- "Topic map" → "Subagent map" in diagram references
- Updated all architecture documentation to use "subagent" terminology
- Updated 19 .agent template files with new labels and comments
- Updated 8 reference documentation files with consistent terminology
API contract preservation:
- Test spec YAML files preserve "topic" terminology to match Testing Center API
- Added clarifying comments explaining topic/subagent equivalence in YAML files
- Field names like `expectedTopic` unchanged (Salesforce API requirement)
Preserved terms:
- "off-topic" (standard phrase for out-of-scope)
- "expectedTopic" field (Testing Center API)
- "platform topics" (Salesforce guardrail features)
32 files changed, 379 insertions(+), 366 deletions(-)
Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
* Complete comprehensive topic-to-subagent terminology update
Thorough update replacing all remaining "topic" references with "subagent"
terminology across developing-agentforce, testing-agentforce, and
observing-agentforce skills to fully align with Agent Script's `subagent`
block naming.
Key changes:
- Agent Script syntax: @topic.<name> → @subagent.<name>
- Agent Script syntax: topic.actions → subagent.actions
- Shell script patterns: ^topic → ^subagent
- Documentation: "topic instructions" → "subagent instructions"
- observing-agentforce skill: Updated all agent architecture references
- Template files: Updated all inline comments and descriptions
- Variable names in scripts: TOPIC → SUBAGENT
Specific updates:
- 45 files changed, 294 insertions, 294 deletions
- Updated all Agent Script code examples to use @subagent syntax
- Updated observing-agentforce issue classification guide
- Updated shell script patterns in diagnostic tools
- Updated Apex comments to clarify topic field maps to subagents
Preserved (as required):
- "off-topic" and "off_topic" (standard out-of-scope phrase)
- Testing Center API fields: expectedTopic, topic: in YAML
- API response fields: .topic, generatedData.topic, topic_assertion
- STDM field names: ssot__TopicApiName__c (with clarifying docs)
- Template placeholders in test specs (API values)
- "Topic hash drift" (API field behavior)
- "Email topic/purpose" (means email subject)
- Explanatory comments about API field mapping
All Agent Script syntax and documentation now consistently uses "subagent"
while preserving backward compatibility with platform API field names.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
* a few more topic -> subagent replacements
---------
Co-authored-by: Steve Hetzel <shetzel@salesforce.com>
Co-authored-by: Claude Sonnet 4.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
142 lines
4.9 KiB
Plaintext
142 lines
4.9 KiB
Plaintext
# Advanced Input Bindings Pattern
|
|
# Demonstrates all parameter binding techniques for Agent Script actions
|
|
#
|
|
# ★ When To Use This Pattern:
|
|
# - Learning different ways to pass values to actions
|
|
# - Combining LLM slot filling with variable binding
|
|
# - Chaining outputs between multiple actions
|
|
# - Complex multi-input action scenarios
|
|
#
|
|
# ★ Key Insight:
|
|
# - `...` (ellipsis) = LLM extracts value from conversation (slot filling)
|
|
# - `"value"` = Fixed constant value
|
|
# - `@variables.x` = Value from stored state
|
|
# - `@outputs.x` = Value from previous action's output
|
|
#
|
|
# ★ Common Use Cases:
|
|
# - Order lookup with user-provided order ID
|
|
# - Multi-step workflows with data passing
|
|
# - Conditional parameter binding
|
|
#
|
|
# This is a PARTIAL template - integrate into a complete agent file
|
|
|
|
# Variables for demonstrating different binding patterns
|
|
variables:
|
|
# ... standard linked variables ...
|
|
current_account_id: mutable string = ""
|
|
description: "Currently selected account ID"
|
|
order_id: mutable string = ""
|
|
description: "Order ID being processed"
|
|
amount: mutable number = 0
|
|
description: "Transaction amount"
|
|
status: mutable string = ""
|
|
description: "Current operation status"
|
|
|
|
subagent order_processing:
|
|
label: "Order Processing"
|
|
description: "Demonstrates advanced input binding patterns"
|
|
|
|
actions:
|
|
# Action with multiple input types
|
|
process_order:
|
|
description: "Process an order with various input methods"
|
|
inputs:
|
|
order_id: string
|
|
description: "The order ID to process"
|
|
amount: number
|
|
description: "Transaction amount in USD"
|
|
account_id: string
|
|
description: "Customer account ID"
|
|
outputs:
|
|
confirmation_number: string
|
|
description: "Order confirmation number"
|
|
processed_amount: number
|
|
description: "Final processed amount"
|
|
target: "flow://Process_Order"
|
|
|
|
get_account:
|
|
description: "Look up account details"
|
|
inputs:
|
|
account_id: string
|
|
description: "Account ID to look up"
|
|
outputs:
|
|
account_name: string
|
|
description: "Account name"
|
|
credit_limit: number
|
|
description: "Available credit"
|
|
target: "flow://Get_Account_Details"
|
|
|
|
send_notification:
|
|
description: "Send order notification"
|
|
inputs:
|
|
confirmation_number: string
|
|
description: "Order confirmation to include"
|
|
recipient_account: string
|
|
description: "Account to notify"
|
|
outputs:
|
|
sent: boolean
|
|
description: "Whether notification was sent"
|
|
target: "flow://Send_Order_Notification"
|
|
|
|
reasoning:
|
|
instructions: ->
|
|
| Help the customer process their order.
|
|
|
|
|
| INPUT BINDING EXAMPLES:
|
|
| 1. Slot filling (...) - LLM extracts from conversation
|
|
| 2. Fixed values - Always use a constant
|
|
| 3. Variable binding - Use stored state
|
|
| 4. Output chaining - Use results from previous action
|
|
|
|
|
| Ask for order details and process appropriately.
|
|
|
|
actions:
|
|
# ★ PATTERN 1: Slot Filling (LLM extracts from conversation)
|
|
# User says "Process order ORD-12345" -> LLM fills order_id="ORD-12345"
|
|
slot_fill_lookup: @actions.process_order
|
|
with order_id=...
|
|
with amount=...
|
|
with account_id=...
|
|
set @variables.order_id = @outputs.confirmation_number
|
|
|
|
# ★ PATTERN 2: Fixed Value (constant)
|
|
# Always uses the same account for default lookups
|
|
fixed_account: @actions.get_account
|
|
with account_id="001DEFAULT000001"
|
|
set @variables.status = @outputs.account_name
|
|
|
|
# ★ PATTERN 3: Variable Binding (from stored state)
|
|
# Uses the account ID saved earlier in the conversation
|
|
variable_binding: @actions.get_account
|
|
with account_id=@variables.current_account_id
|
|
set @variables.status = @outputs.account_name
|
|
|
|
# ★ PATTERN 4: Output Chaining (from previous action)
|
|
# Uses confirmation_number from process_order to send notification
|
|
chained_output: @actions.process_order
|
|
with order_id=...
|
|
with amount=@variables.amount
|
|
with account_id=@variables.current_account_id
|
|
set @variables.order_id = @outputs.confirmation_number
|
|
run @actions.send_notification
|
|
with confirmation_number=@outputs.confirmation_number
|
|
with recipient_account=@variables.current_account_id
|
|
|
|
# ★ PATTERN 5: Mixed Binding (combining patterns)
|
|
# Some inputs from LLM, some from variables, some fixed
|
|
mixed_binding: @actions.process_order
|
|
with order_id=... # LLM slot fills
|
|
with amount=@variables.amount # From variable
|
|
with account_id="001INTERNAL00001" # Fixed value
|
|
|
|
# ★ Insight: Binding Pattern Decision Tree
|
|
#
|
|
# Need the LLM to extract from conversation? -> Use `...`
|
|
# Value is always the same constant? -> Use "value"
|
|
# Value was captured in a previous step? -> Use @variables.x
|
|
# Value comes from another action's output? -> Use @outputs.x (in callback)
|
|
#
|
|
# ★ Common Mistake: Using @outputs.x outside of a `run` callback
|
|
# @outputs.x is only available inside the action's callback chain
|
|
# Store important outputs in @variables for use elsewhere
|